Urban ecosystems: Intersecting philosophical and biological perspectives in city analysis
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15254314Keywords:
city, phenomenon, ecosystem, survive, paradigmAbstract
How to address urban systems as biological entities has become a hot topic, especially since modern problems - such as climate change and urbanization - have emerged. A scientific approach to comprehending modern urban problems and the development of new technological possibilities to solve urban ecology-related problems can only be achieved, first and foremost, by blending the perception of urban systems with a biological framework. For this, it is necessary to understand and reconstruct the axioms of the organization of the human populations that create city systems. The main research question of this paper is whether urban systems can be studied from a biological perspective, and if so, to discuss the basic premise arguments for such a biological perspective, and the potential for these arguments to take concrete form for the study of the city system in a biological way. In this context, in this article, we have aimed to construct an abstract treatment of urban systems as biological phenomena. It is hoped that this work will open up new perspectives in the academic literature, which may help in the translation of abstract philosophical concepts into a biological understanding of urban systems.
Downloads
References
Aina, M. P., Djihouessi, B., Vissin, E. W., Kpondjo, N. M., Gbèdo, V., & Sohounhloué, K. C. D. (2012). Characterization of the domestic wastewaters and dimensionality of a pilot treatment station by lagooning at Abomey Calavi City- Benin. ISCA Journal of Engineering Sciences, 1, 45–50.
Alberti, M. (2010). Maintaining ecological integrity and sustaining ecosystem function in urban areas. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 2(3), 178–184. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cosust.2010.07.002
Alberti, M., Marzluff, J. M., Shulenberger, E., Bradley, G., Ryan, C., & Zumbrunnen, C. (2003). Integrating humans into ecology: Opportunities and challenges for studying urban ecosystem. BioScience, 53(12), 1169–1179.
Ambler, W. H. (1985). Aristotle’s understanding of the naturalness of the city. The Review of Politics, 47(2), 163–185. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0034670500036688
Aristotle. (1994). De Anima (E. J. Brill, Ed.). Leiden.
Bahabry, A., Ghazzai, H., Vesonder, G., & Massoud, Y. (2019). Space-time low complexity algorithms for scheduling a fleet of UAVs in smart cities using dimensionality reduction approaches. In 2019 IEEE International Systems Conference (SysCon) (pp. 1–8). IEEE.
Baldwin, A. (2017). Climate change, migration, and the crisis of humanism. WIREs Climate Change, 8(3). https://doi.org/10.1002/wcc.460
Bejan, A. (2020). Human evolution is biological & technological evolution. Biosystems, 195, 104156. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biosystems.2020.104156
Bourke, A. F. G. (2011). Social group formation. In Principles of Social Evolution (pp. 95–128). Oxford University Press.
Campbell, M. C., & Tishkoff, S. A. (2010). The evolution of human genetic and phenotypic variation in Africa. Current Biology, 20(4), R166–R173. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2009.11.050
Chen, S., Krinsky, B. H., & Long, M. (2013). New genes as drivers of phenotypic evolution. Nature Reviews Genetics, 14(9), 645–660. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrg3521
Cohen, M. J., & Garrett, J. L. (2010). The food price crisis and urban food (in)security. Environment and Urbanization, 22(2), 467–482. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956247810380375
Cronan, T. (2004). Biological poetry: Santayana’s aesthetics. Qui Parle, 15(1), 115–145. https://doi.org/10.1215/quiparle.15.1.115
Farris, F. A. (2010). The Gini index and measures of inequality. The American Mathematical Monthly, 117(10), 851. https://doi.org/10.4169/000298910x523344
Grimm, N. B., Faeth, S. H., Golubiewski, N. E., Redman, C. L., Wu, J., Bai, X., & Briggs, J. M. (2008). Global change and the ecology of cities. Science, 319(5864), 756–760. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1150195
Grimm, N. B., Grove, J., Pickett, S. T. A., & Redman, C. L. (2000). Integrated approaches to long-term studies of urban ecological systems: Urban ecological systems present multiple challenges to ecologists—pervasive human impact and extreme heterogeneity of cities, and the need to integrate social and ecological approaches, concepts, and theory. BioScience, 50(7), 571–584.
Hajduk, S., & Litavniece, L. (2019). Dimensionality of an urban transport system based on ISO 37120 indicators for the case of selected European cities. Engineering Management in Production and Services, 11(4), 80–91. https://doi.org/10.2478/emj-2019-0035
Karl, T. R., & Trenberth, K. E. (2003). Modern global climate change. Science, 302(5651), 1719–1723. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1090228
Kennedy, C., Cuddihy, J., & Engel-Yan, J. (2007). The changing metabolism of cities. Journal of Industrial Ecology, 11(2), 43–59. https://doi.org/10.1162/jie.2007.1107
Kwantes, C. T., & Karam, C. M. (n.d.). Social axioms and organizational behavior. In Psychological Aspects of Social Axioms (pp. 31–50). Springer New York.
McCarthy, M. P., Best, M. J., & Betts, R. A. (2010). Climate change in cities due to global warming and urban effects. Geophysical Research Letters, 37(9), n/a–n/a. https://doi.org/10.1029/2010GL042845
McDonnell, M. J., & MacGregor-Fors, I. (2016). The ecological future of cities. Science, 352(6288), 936–938. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aaf3630
Pareto, V. E., & Pareto, M. P. (2008). The urban component of the energy crisis. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1221622
Pickett, S. (2012). Ecology of the city: A perspective from science. In Urban Design Ecologies (pp. 162–171). John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Pickett, S. T. A., Burch, W. R., Jr., Dalton, S. E., Foresman, T. W., Grove, J. M., & Rowntree, R. (1997). A conceptual framework for the study of human ecosystems in urban areas. Urban Ecosystems, 185–199.
Pickett, S. T. A., Cadenasso, M. L., Childers, D. L., McDonnell, M. J., & Zhou, W. (2016). Evolution and future of urban ecological science: Ecology in, of, and for the city. Ecosystem Health and Sustainability, 2(7). https://doi.org/10.1002/ehs2.1229
Portugali, J. (2016). What makes cities complex? In (pp. 3–19).
Ramalho, C. E., & Hobbs, R. J. (2012). Time for a change: Dynamic urban ecology. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 27(3), 179–188. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2011.10.008
Rozzi, R., & Palmer, C. A. (Eds.). (2013). Linking ecology and ethics for a changing world: Values, philosophy, and action. Springer.
Saatkamp, H., & Coleman, M. (2020). George Santayana. In The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Fall 2020 Edition).
Santayana, G. (1923). Scepticism and animal faith. Dover Publications.
Sassen, S., & Dotan, N. (2011). Delegating, not returning, to the biosphere: How to use the multi-scalar and ecological properties of cities. Global Environmental Change, 21(3), 823–834. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2011.03.018
Satterthwaite, D. (2009). The implications of population growth and urbanization for climate change. Environment and Urbanization, 21(2), 545–567. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956247809344361
Smith, M. D., Knapp, A. K., & Collins, S. L. (2009). A framework for assessing ecosystem dynamics in response to chronic resource alterations induced by global change. Ecology, 90(12), 3279–3289. https://doi.org/10.1890/08-1815.1
Tiedje, J. M., Bruns, M. A., Casadevall, A., Criddle, C. S., Eloe-Fadrosh, E., Karl, D. M., Nguyen, N. K., & Zhou, J. (2022). Microbes and climate change: A research prospectus for the future. MBio, 13(3). https://doi.org/10.1128/mbio.00800-22
Wang, X. T. (1996). Domain-specific rationality in human choices: Violations of utility axioms and social contexts. Cognition, 60(1), 31–63. https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0277(95)00700-8
Zhang, Y. E., & Long, M. (2014). New genes contribute to genetic and phenotypic novelties in human evolution. Current Opinion in Genetics & Development, 29, 90–96. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gde.2014.08.013
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Leman Nur Nehri, Mustafa Çakıroğlu

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
The Turkish Journal of Sense of Place and Urban Studies is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0) License. This license allows for the distribution and reproduction of the journal's articles, provided that the original work is properly attributed to the authors and not used for commercial purposes.
Under the terms of this license, users are free to share (copy, distribute and transmit) and remix (adapt) the journal's articles, as long as they give appropriate credit to the authors, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made.
Users may not use the journal's articles for commercial purposes without obtaining permission from the authors. For any commercial use, please contact the authors directly.
By using the articles from the Turkish Journal of Sense of Place and Urban Studies, users agree to be bound by the terms of the CC BY-NC 4.0 license.